Watch Minahil Malik Leak video Original

Looking at human rights protection and privacy in the twenty-first century.

More and more, the Internet and technological advancement are seen as an essential part of society, thus triggering more controversy concerning rights as well as privacy online. Some of the most important concerns related to preserving fundamental individual rights and personal privacy in the Internet present some of today’s major challenges.

Freedom of Expression

One of the basic rights that entail free speech is free speech that allows the expression of information and opinion in society. But social media communication has options, but maybe there could be some restrictions on it, and maybe some freedom of speech might get suppressed via censorship and other ways. There are several threats to free expression, such as authoritative internet policies in some countries which provide restrictions to the given internet sites and contents. There are also worries that social media websites deem legal speech as forbidden since they are guided by other policies. Protection of freedom of speech in relation to other rights and freedoms of the human person presents continuing challenges in the contemporary world.

Access to Information

In general, thanks to the Internet, people receive more information from different sources than people in any other period in history. However, the research found that there is still a digital divide that limits some groups to fully make use of online information. The usage and usage of information and communications technology opportunities is influenced by socioeconomic status, region, age, gender and disability. These efforts for bridging digital divides need actions from all of the stakeholders, such as policy makers, engineers, teachers, telecom industry and other similar entities. Reliability versus the multitude of such phenomena as censorship, filter bubbles, fake news, misinformation attacks, and algorithmic prejudice, people still continue to struggle with access, not least because the information people find on the internet is often unreliable. That is why media literacy education is necessary.

Data Privacy Protections

However, with the wide use of such gathering of digital data and e-tracking, there is a need to have better data privacy measures to allow the users to have better control over their information. Many users’ personal information can be disclosed, gathered, or traded without permission. Major privacy laws have not caught up with advancements in technology in data processing and/or microtargeting. Customers are not very good at comprehending long winded paragraphs filled with legalese in its privacy policies. Tabling strategies such as data minimization, incorporating privacy by design models within organizations, banning on the collection of children’s data, coming up with national data protection laws, enhancement on the cookie consent executions, as well as providing privacy oriented services would assist in the protection of rights. Still, most protections remain modest compared to the extensive data access that entities enjoy for the surveillance capitalism cut.

Censorship Circumvention

Some authoritarian governments limit internet freedom, thus conflicting free speech and information. For instance, the Great Firewall within China helps to block sites and limit access to the internet infrastructure. It is now clear that Reporters Without Borders has identified at least 53 nations employing some kind of technical censorship. Techniques involving VPNs, Tor nets, mesh nets, and dark nets are means through which citizens can unblock when gaining access to blocked content is not unlawful. Sites such as GreatFire and the Turkish Alternative DNS seek to play a role while thus helping the circumventing. However, censorship technology also remains evolving on both sides.

There are questions related to government surveillance.

Starting in 2013, whistleblowers who included Snowden leaked secret surveillance systems carried out by organizations such as the NSA to spy on citizens’ activities on social networks. Evidently, however, experts note that policy reform has remained more or less lip-service because governments maintain that surveillance is for security’s sake. It is also very useful in helping police investigations digital tracking. Nonetheless, privacy hawks argue that privacy invasive surveillance undermine rights and encourages the silencing of legal free speech expression. However, the spread of the transparency and accountability of state surveillance remains too loose.

Algorithmic Bias and Discrimination

Algorithms became a part of society/public and personal/private lives and only served to magnify the prejudice that already existed. Some of them include problems like the predictive policing system deepening the racially disproportionate pol.” although AI technologies hold the potential to solve many problems in modern society, some of them are racist in nature and include but not limited to the following: For that, civil rights groups call for technology accountability measures such as auditing algorithms for discrimination, fixing machine learning datasets, enhancing AI transparency and the creation of oversight boards. But to detect algorithmic unfairness and implement changes is not an easy process.

False information and deception

In her paper, written in 2018, Amichai-Hawe defined fake news as being widely shared in global social networks and communities at an inconceivable rate. An example of how real candidates for election can be threatened by computational propaganda was observed in the 2016 USA election when Russia was accused of funding fake news site on social media such as Facebook and Twitter. They have also defended the engagement focus, arguing it allowed bad actors to spread fake news and foment echo chambers for large chunks of society. Thus, policy responses gave more importance on the issues of fake account eradication as opposed to the issues of real and meaningful accountability. Along with deepfake videos that provide AI-edited video and images, the possibility of manipulation through viral misinformation is one of the most significant digital rights considerations notified among the appeals for better regulation.

The Protection of Children’s Welfare

Youngsters of today create their own profiles at a very tender age, employing sites for users under 13 years but security free for thought. Some of the risks incorporate cyberbullying, sexual abuses such as grooming, overly sexualized content, and sexual and predatory advertising. Experts call for changed rules, such as an improved parents’ filter, a more strict ban on advertisements targeting children, and a ban on stimulating feedback encouraging usage harmful to children’s mental health. One of the presented regulation models is the Age Appropriate Design Code in the United Kingdom that targets children’s necessity and susceptibility to technology, software, and digital policies. However, the goal of complete legally based Internet youth protections continues to be sought after.

In evaluating this range of issues, the fight for advocating digital rights is similar to fighting for human rights in a world of internet capabilities. With the extended civic participation and social interactions in and through the networked technologies, the policy paradigms must necessarily also accommodate the core constitutional rights for individuals: freedoms of speech and access; rights to privacy and self-governance; right to security; and an equal, non-discriminatory opportunity. While regulation disagreements persist across the globe, politicians, civil activists, and ordinary users assert that people’s rights are the same in cyberspace as they are in real life. While promoting digital equity remains a challenging process that needs many sociopolitical transformations, setting rights-oriented norms within progressive sectors will become crucial for PBA as well as democratic engagement in the 21st century.

umair